linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/14] x86_64 irq: Use NR_IRQS not NR_IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m17iu9unb6.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:26:53 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...radead.org>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] x86_64 irq: Use NR_IRQS not NR_IRQ_VECTORS


NR_IRQ_VECTORS is currently a compatiblity define set to NR_IRQs.
This patch updates the users of NR_IRQ_VECTORS to use NR_IRQs instead
so that NR_IRQ_VECTORS can be removed.

There is still shared code with arch/i386 that uses NR_IRQ_VECTORS 
so we can't remove the #define just yet :(

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
index 52fc19b..65d7218 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int nr_ioapic_registers[MAX_IO_APICS];
  * Rough estimation of how many shared IRQs there are, can
  * be changed anytime.
  */
-#define MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS NR_IRQ_VECTORS
+#define MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS NR_IRQS
 #define PIN_MAP_SIZE (MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS + NR_IRQS)
 
 /*
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static int pin_2_irq(int idx, int apic, int pin)
 
 
 /* irq_vectors is indexed by the sum of all RTEs in all I/O APICs. */
-static u8 irq_vector[NR_IRQ_VECTORS] __read_mostly = {
+static u8 irq_vector[NR_IRQS] __read_mostly = {
 	[0] = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 0,
 	[1] = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 1,
 	[2] = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 2,
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static u8 irq_vector[NR_IRQ_VECTORS] __read_mostly = {
 	[15] = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 15,
 };
 
-static cpumask_t irq_domain[NR_IRQ_VECTORS] __read_mostly = {
+static cpumask_t irq_domain[NR_IRQS] __read_mostly = {
 	[0] = CPU_MASK_ALL,
 	[1] = CPU_MASK_ALL,
 	[2] = CPU_MASK_ALL,
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, cpumask_t mask, cpumask_t *result)
 	int old_vector = -1;
 	int cpu;
 
-	BUG_ON((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQ_VECTORS);
+	BUG_ON((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQS);
 
 	/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
 	cpus_and(mask, mask, cpu_online_map);
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
 	int irq, vector;
 
 	/* Mark the inuse vectors */
-	for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQ_VECTORS; ++irq) {
+	for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS; ++irq) {
 		if (!cpu_isset(cpu, irq_domain[irq]))
 			continue;
 		vector = irq_vector[irq];
-- 
1.5.0.g53756

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/