[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070223145826.GA32465@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:58:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: A quick fio test (was Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3)
* Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com> wrote:
> As a really crude (and not very realistic) example of the potential
> impact of large numbers of outstanding IOs, I tried some quick direct
> IO comparisons using fio:
>
> [global]
> ioengine=syslet-rw
> buffered=0
> rw=randread
> bs=64k
> size=1024m
> iodepth=64
could you please try those iodepth=20000 tests with the latest
fio-testing branch of fio as well? Jens wrote a new, smarter syslet
plugin for FIO. You'll need the v3 syslet kernel plus:
git-clone git://git.kernel.dk/data/git/fio.git
cd fio
git-checkout syslet-testing
my expectation is that it should behave better with iodepth=20000
(although i havent tried that yet).
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists