[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45DF0DA8.9010305@tmr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:52:08 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
> NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
>
>
>> + for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
>>
>
> That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
> incinerated.
>
> What's wrong with doing
>
> for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
>
> in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification?
I don't find either hard to read, but you suggestion isn't equivalent,
since it increments rather than decrements the index.
I admit I probably would write it the same way Neil did...
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@....com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists