[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070223171348.GA27838@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:43:48 +0530
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: A quick fio test (was Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3)
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23 2007, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:58:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > As a really crude (and not very realistic) example of the potential
> > > > impact of large numbers of outstanding IOs, I tried some quick direct
> > > > IO comparisons using fio:
> > > >
> > > > [global]
> > > > ioengine=syslet-rw
> > > > buffered=0
> > > > rw=randread
> > > > bs=64k
> > > > size=1024m
> > > > iodepth=64
> > >
> > > could you please try those iodepth=20000 tests with the latest
> > > fio-testing branch of fio as well? Jens wrote a new, smarter syslet
> > > plugin for FIO. You'll need the v3 syslet kernel plus:
> > >
> > > git-clone git://git.kernel.dk/data/git/fio.git
> > > cd fio
> > > git-checkout syslet-testing
> > >
> > > my expectation is that it should behave better with iodepth=20000
> > > (although i havent tried that yet).
> >
> > I picked up the fio snapshot from 22nd Feb (fio-git-20070222212513.tar.gz)
> > and used the v3 syslet patches from your web-site.
> >
> > Do I still need to get something more recent ?
>
> Yes, you need to test the syslet+testing branch that Ingo referenced.
> Your test above is not totally fair right now, since you are doing
> significantly less system calls with libaio. So to compare apples with
> apples, try the syslet-testing branch. If you can't get it because of
> firewall problems, check http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ for the latest
> fio snapshot. If it has the syslet-testing branch, then that is
> recent enough.
I have a feeling this is getting to be a little more bleeding edge than
I had anticipated :), so will just hold off for a bit until this
crystallizes a bit.
Regards
Suparna
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists