[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070223223112.GJ7920@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:31:12 -0800
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: A quick fio test (was Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3)
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:52:47PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Results:
>
> Engine Depth Bw (MiB/sec)
> --------------------------------------------
> libaio 1 441
> syslet 1 574
> sync 1 589
> libaio 32 613
> syslet 32 681
Can we get runs with large I/Os, large I/O depths, and most
importantly tons of processes? I can absolutely believe that syslets
would compete well with one process on the system. But with 1000
processes doing 1000s of blocking I/Os, I'd really be interested to see
how that plays out.
Joel
--
Joel's Second Law:
If a code change requires additional user setup, it is wrong.
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists