linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070223084712.717a0ee4.khali@linux-fr.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:47:12 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@....nl>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	notting@...hat.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:13:30 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I'm thinking that it might be an idea to also use this idea of udev autoloading 
> through DMI info for the abituguru and abituguru3 driver (review please). The 
> both only support about 12 motherboards. For the abituguru driver, dmi info 
> could also be used to automatically set the module options needed on the 2 
> oldest uguru featuring abit motherboards. What do you think about this?

Given that the uguru chips are hard (impossible) to detect and only a
small number of boards need it, yes, I think it's a good idea.

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/