[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d53z1x8x.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:49:34 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@...lingofgreen.ru>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
David Wagner <daw-usenet@...erner.cs.berkeley.edu>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
* Samium Gromoff:
>> > Lisp environments can produce standalone executables
>>
>> If you've got a stand-alone executable, you don't need MAP_FIXED. The
>> ELF loader maps the program at a fixed address anyway (at least on
>> i386 and x86_64, I haven't checked others).
>
> Not so.
>
> The thing is that the picture is of two pieces:
>
> - the executable
> - the unrelocatable lisp core (which is unrelocatable by the virtue
> of non-PIC code) which is mapped into the AS of the executable.
>
> It is the latter which breaks, as its map can overlap with randomized
> pieces of the executable (along with its libraries).
I think it boils down to the question if you can use ELF relocations
to create a relocatable (but not necessarily position-independent)
object that ld can link with the SBCL run-time system to produce an
executable. This executable would truly be stand-alone because no
separate core file is required anymore.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists