| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070224202737.GA162@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:27:37 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: kill NOAUTOREL works
We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works
correctly. It is better to simplify API.
Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to
avoid a confusion.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 6.20-rc6-mm3/include/linux/workqueue.h~kill_nar 2007-02-12 03:26:54.000000000 +0300
+++ 6.20-rc6-mm3/include/linux/workqueue.h 2007-02-24 22:40:15.000000000 +0300
@@ -24,15 +24,13 @@ typedef void (*work_func_t)(struct work_
struct work_struct {
atomic_long_t data;
#define WORK_STRUCT_PENDING 0 /* T if work item pending execution */
-#define WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL 1 /* F if work item automatically released on exec */
#define WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK (3UL)
#define WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK (~WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK)
struct list_head entry;
work_func_t func;
};
-#define WORK_DATA_INIT(autorelease) \
- ATOMIC_LONG_INIT((autorelease) << WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL)
+#define WORK_DATA_INIT() ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0)
struct delayed_work {
struct work_struct work;
@@ -44,14 +42,8 @@ struct execute_work {
};
#define __WORK_INITIALIZER(n, f) { \
- .data = WORK_DATA_INIT(0), \
- .entry = { &(n).entry, &(n).entry }, \
- .func = (f), \
- }
-
-#define __WORK_INITIALIZER_NAR(n, f) { \
- .data = WORK_DATA_INIT(1), \
- .entry = { &(n).entry, &(n).entry }, \
+ .data = WORK_DATA_INIT(), \
+ .entry = { &(n).entry, &(n).entry }, \
.func = (f), \
}
@@ -60,23 +52,12 @@ struct execute_work {
.timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(NULL, 0, 0), \
}
-#define __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER_NAR(n, f) { \
- .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER_NAR((n).work, (f)), \
- .timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(NULL, 0, 0), \
- }
-
#define DECLARE_WORK(n, f) \
struct work_struct n = __WORK_INITIALIZER(n, f)
-#define DECLARE_WORK_NAR(n, f) \
- struct work_struct n = __WORK_INITIALIZER_NAR(n, f)
-
#define DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(n, f) \
struct delayed_work n = __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER(n, f)
-#define DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(n, f) \
- struct dwork_struct n = __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER_NAR(n, f)
-
/*
* initialize a work item's function pointer
*/
@@ -95,16 +76,9 @@ struct execute_work {
* assignment of the work data initializer allows the compiler
* to generate better code.
*/
-#define INIT_WORK(_work, _func) \
- do { \
- (_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(0); \
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
- PREPARE_WORK((_work), (_func)); \
- } while (0)
-
-#define INIT_WORK_NAR(_work, _func) \
+#define INIT_WORK(_work, _func) \
do { \
- (_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(1); \
+ (_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
PREPARE_WORK((_work), (_func)); \
} while (0)
@@ -115,12 +89,6 @@ struct execute_work {
init_timer(&(_work)->timer); \
} while (0)
-#define INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(_work, _func) \
- do { \
- INIT_WORK_NAR(&(_work)->work, (_func)); \
- init_timer(&(_work)->timer); \
- } while (0)
-
/**
* work_pending - Find out whether a work item is currently pending
* @work: The work item in question
@@ -136,25 +104,7 @@ struct execute_work {
#define delayed_work_pending(w) \
work_pending(&(w)->work)
-/**
- * work_release - Release a work item under execution
- * @work: The work item to release
- *
- * This is used to release a work item that has been initialised with automatic
- * release mode disabled (WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL is set). This gives the work
- * function the opportunity to grab auxiliary data from the container of the
- * work_struct before clearing the pending bit as the work_struct may be
- * subject to deallocation the moment the pending bit is cleared.
- *
- * In such a case, this should be called in the work function after it has
- * fetched any data it may require from the containter of the work_struct.
- * After this function has been called, the work_struct may be scheduled for
- * further execution or it may be deallocated unless other precautions are
- * taken.
- *
- * This should also be used to release a delayed work item.
- */
-#define work_release(work) \
+#define work_clear_pending(work) \
clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))
@@ -201,7 +151,7 @@ static inline int cancel_delayed_work(st
ret = del_timer_sync(&work->timer);
if (ret)
- work_release(&work->work);
+ work_clear_pending(&work->work);
return ret;
}
--- 6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/workqueue.c~kill_nar 2007-02-17 00:31:18.000000000 +0300
+++ 6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-02-20 02:21:11.000000000 +0300
@@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
BUG_ON(get_wq_data(work) != cwq);
- if (!test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL, work_data_bits(work)))
- work_release(work);
+ work_clear_pending(work);
f(work);
if (unlikely(in_atomic() || lockdep_depth(current) > 0)) {
@@ -454,7 +453,7 @@ void cancel_work_sync(struct work_struct
*/
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
list_del_init(&work->entry);
- work_release(work);
+ work_clear_pending(work);
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
wq = cwq->wq;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists