linux-kernel - Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070224193322.GA17276@lazybastard.org>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:33:23 +0000
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator

On Sat, 24 February 2007 09:32:49 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> If that is a problem for particular object pools then we may be able to 
> except those from the merging.

How much of a gain is the merging anyway?  Once you start having
explicit whitelists or blacklists of pools that can be merged, one can
start to wonder if the result is worth the effort.

Jörn

-- 
Joern's library part 6:
http://www.gzip.org/zlib/feldspar.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/