linux-kernel - Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.20-git] parport reports physical devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702241349.40906.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:49:40 -0800
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, andrea@...e.de, tim@...erelk.net,
	philb@....org
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.20-git] parport reports physical devices

On Tuesday 20 February 2007 1:10 pm, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > There are probably good reasons (== deep hardware braindamage on older
> > systems that are now hard to find) for the strange init sequencing in
> > that code, but I can't see why they should prevent splitting out
> > 
> > 	(a) device discovery via probing, PNP, or whatever; from
> > 
> > 	(b) the driver itself, getting handed a device node that's
> > 	    pre-configured with the resources reported by discovery.
> > 
> > Maybe the maintainers of the parport stack will have comments.  Though
> > the info in MAINTAINERS seems dated, if not obsolete.
> 
> Phil Blundell and Tim Waugh did not reply to me last time I sent a
> parport cleanup patch to them. I suspect they are indeed no longer
> maintaining parport in practice.

Neither of them seem to have acked patches in drivers/parport for some
time either, much less signed off on them.  And that webpage lists the
latest patches (from Tim) ... for 2.5.6-pre2!!  For the moment I've got
the appended patch in my set of parport patches.  Unless one of the
folk listed as maintainers (cc'd) squawks appropriately, I'll send this
along with the next batch of patches. 

- Dave


The writing on the wall seem to be that the parport stack is orphaned,
rather than maintained...

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>

Index: g26/MAINTAINERS
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/MAINTAINERS	2007-02-20 22:17:27.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/MAINTAINERS	2007-02-20 22:22:57.000000000 -0800
@@ -2553,16 +2553,8 @@ L:	i2c@...sensors.org
 S:	Maintained
 
 PARALLEL PORT SUPPORT
-P:	Phil Blundell
-M:	philb@....org
-P:	Tim Waugh
-M:	tim@...erelk.net
-P:	David Campbell
-P:	Andrea Arcangeli
-M:	andrea@...e.de
 L:	linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
-W:	http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/parport/
-S:	Maintained
+S:	Orphan
 
 PARIDE DRIVERS FOR PARALLEL PORT IDE DEVICES
 P:	Tim Waugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/