[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702240052360.9507@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:05:27 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Joel Becker wrote:
> The locking fix to sys_mincore in commit
> 2f77d107050abc14bc393b34bdb7b91cf670c250 returns -ENOMEM when given a
> bad userspace address. It should return -EFAULT.
No, I think you're getting confused by the way Linus uses access_ok
on the address range given with the access_ok on the vector address.
Before and after, an access_ok failure on the output vector address
gives -EFAULT. Before and after, an invalid address in the range
to be inspected gives -ENOMEM.
Which is consistent with the other m* system calls: -EFAULT if
arguments are inaccessible, -ENOMEM if address range is invalid.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists