linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] VM throttling: avoid blocking occasional writers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:46:46 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	miklos@...redi.hu, yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
	yuji.kakutani.uw@...achi.com, soshima@...hat.com, haoki@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] VM throttling: avoid blocking occasional
 writers

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:03:37 +0900
Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have observed a problem that write(2) can be blocked for a long time
> if a system has several disks and is under heavy I/O pressure. This
> patchset is to avoid the problem.
> 
> Example of the probrem:
> 
> There are two processes on a system which has two disks. Process-A
> writes heavily to disk-a, and process-B writes small data (e.g. log
> files) to disk-b occasionally. A portion of system memory, which is
> depends on vm.dirty_ratio (typically 40%), is filled up with Dirty
> and Writeback pages of disk-a.
> 
> In this situation, write(2) of process-B could be blocked for a very
> long time (more then 60 seconds), although the load of disk-b is quite
> low. In particular, the system would become quite slow, if disk-a is
> slow (e.g. backup to an USB disk).
> 
> This seems to be the same problem as discussed in LKML:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115559902900003
> and
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=117182340400003
> 
Interesting, but how about adjust this parameter like below instead of
adding new control knob ?(this kind of knob is not easy to use.)

==
                struct writeback_control wbc = {
                        .bdi            = bdi,
                        .sync_mode      = WB_SYNC_NONE,
                        .older_than_this = NULL,
                        .nr_to_write    = 0,
                        .range_cyclic   = 1,
                };
<snip>
                if (nr_reclaimable) {
			/* Just do what I can do */
			dirty_pages_on_device = count_dirty_pages_on_device_limited(bdi, writechunk);
			wbc.nr_to_write = dirty_pages_on_device.
			writeback_inodes(&wbc);
 
==

count_dirty_pages_on_device_limited(bdi, writechunk) above returns 
dirty pages on bdi. if # of dirty_pages on bdi is larger than writechunk,
just returns writechunk.

-Kame





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/