linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: Deferred IO and hecubafb driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45a44e480702240024w30c0c2e2uaa01f3ed8f7457c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:24:20 -0500
From:	"Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
To:	"Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: Deferred IO and hecubafb driver

On 2/23/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:32:28AM +0100, Jaya Kumar wrote:
> > This is a first pass at abstracting deferred IO out from hecubafb and
> > into fbdev as was discussed before:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fbdev-devel&m=117187443327466&w=2
> >
> > Please let me know your feedback and if it looks okay so far.
> >
> How about this for an fsync()? I wonder if this will be sufficient for
> msync() based flushing, or whether the ->sync VMA op is needed again..
>

Looks fine to me.

Thanks,
jaya
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/