linux-kernel - Re: REQ_HARDBARRIER and REQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:42:06 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	V P <upathiyayan@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: REQ_HARDBARRIER and REQ_SOFTBARRIER

On Sat, Feb 24 2007, V P wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to modify the ordering of I/O requests in Linux kernel, and
> came across the barrier flags REQ_HARDBARRIER and REQ_SOFTBARRIER.
> 
> One thing I noticed (which might be wrong) is that all the requests
> have both these flags set. What is the significance of these flags? Is

Uhm? That's definitely not true.

> it a must for a request to have this? Can I reorder two requests with
> these flags set? How is SOFTBARRIER different from HARDBARRIER?

Both imply a reordering barrier in the io scheduler, and the hard
barrier further implies a barrier at the drive/driver side. So you may
not reorder across a barrier.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/