linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-ck1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <200702251133.53117.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:33:52 -0500
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	ck mailing list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-ck1

On Sunday 25 February 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:
>On Sunday 25 February 2007 15:34, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I have a problem, Con.  The patch itself works fine for me, BUT it
[...]
>> Can we have a patch to address this?  Or should I just hardcode it
>> since it will never be linked to any other later kernel?
>>
>> I tried that in the src tree's include/linux/version.h, but it was
>> refreshed back to the original regex code by the make, so that's not
>> where to do it obviously.  I've also made the simlink in /usr/src, but
>> since a kernel make re-writes version.h, that didn't help.
>>
>> Whats next?
>
>I've never heard of this problem before. As far as I'm aware the
> EXTRAVERSION usually is not included in version.h so it seems to be a
> limitation of the flgrx installer? That would mean the flgrx installer
> wouldn't work on any kernel with an extra version such as the -rc
> releases of mainline even. So I'm sorry but I don't really know what to
> do about this problem.

Well, fwiw, I rebooted to 2.6.20 after looking at the error message again, 
and I didn't expect it to work, and it didn't.  Attempting to build it 
from a console before I ever startx'd, the error message is that the 
modules are versioned as "" where the kernel is "2.6.20".
========================================
[Message] Kernel Module : Trying to install a precompiled kernel module.
[Message] Kernel Module : Precompiled kernel module version mismatched.
[Message] Kernel Module : Found kernel module build environment, 
generating kernel module now.
ATI module generator V 2.0
==========================
initializing...
Error:
kernel includes at /lib/modules/2.6.20/build/include do not match current 
kernel.
they are versioned as ""
instead of "2.6.20".
you might need to adjust your symlinks:
- /usr/include
- /usr/src/linux
[Error] Kernel Module : Failed to compile kernel module - please consult 
readme.
=======================
Modules versioning is enabled in the build .config:

[root@...ote linux-2.6.20]# grep VERSION .config
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
# CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set
# CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL=y

So it appears the installer simply isn't capable of finding the modinfo at 
all.

So much for ati's linux support, they can't even throw working code over 
the fence.  I've ordered an nvidia 6800 card for the next round of 
testing.  2+ years of screwing around with a garden slug speed video is 
enough.

Thanks for the reply Con, I appreciate it.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/