linux-kernel - Re: all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070225170656.GA14698@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:06:56 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz?

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:41:54AM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@....cz) wrote:
> > > I've done so, with some interesting results. Source on
> > > http://ds9a.nl/tmp/recvtimings.c - be careful to adjust the '3000' divider
> > > to your CPU frequency if you care about absolute numbers!
> > > 
> > > These are two groups, each consisting of 10 consecutive nonblocking UDP
> > > recvfroms, with 10 packets preloaded. Reported is the number of microseconds
> > > per recvfrom call which yielded a packet:
> > > 
> > > $ ./recvtimings
> > > 4.142333
> > 
> > It can be recvfrom only problem - syscall overhead on my p4 (core duo,
> > debian testing) is bout 300 usec - to test I ran 
> 
> core duo is _not_ p4 class cpu; rsulets there will be very different.

Results nevertheless are the same.
Each syscall takes some time first (noticebly more than subsequent
calls), and that was a main problem for Bert.
Given the high load, recvfrom() can even take tens of microseconds
(although I can not provide a profile output yet, but I showed a data).

So, syscall overhead itself is very small no matter which type of the
CPU is used - athlon is about 300 nsec, via epia about 1.4 usec), 
but the whole function can take quite a lot of time.

> 									Pavel
> 
> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/