linux-kernel - Re: RFC/patch: down_timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1172385954.3265.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:45:54 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Iñaky Pérez-González 
	<inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC/patch: down_timeout_interruptible()


> I gave it a quick try (must admit, not too tested) and it seems that
> the setting of TIF_SIGPENDING without really having a signal queued
> is not having easily visible ugly consequences.


what happens if you get a signal around the time the timeout fires?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/