[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702261443.46791.ossthema@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:43:46 +0100
From: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
"Jan-Bernd Themann" <themann@...ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ppc" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Optional TX/RX path optimized for SMP
Hi
> Also, as far as the approach of using tasklets, I think it would be
> better to use the "fake netdev" approach to continue to use NAPI.
> Basically you create a pseudo-netdev for each receive queue and have
> NAPI handle the polling for you -- you could look for
> drivers/net/cxgb3 for an example of this.
>
Thanks for pointing us to this solution. We are now building a NAPI version
that makes use of these pseudo-netdev. The fairness amongst other netdevices
should be better this way.
>
> Why make this a module option that the user has to set? Are there any
> circumstances when someone wouldn't want "significant performance
> improvements?" If this approach is just better, then it should just
> replace the old code.
>
We'll change the default behaviour to multi queue, but we'd like to keep
the option to run in a single queue mode for debug and backward compabilty.
Thanks,
Jan-Bernd & Christoph R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists