linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Fast assurate clock readable from user space and NMI handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:12:01 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	mbligh@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fast assurate clock readable from user space and NMI
	handler

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 17:14 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:


> For kernel and user space tracing, those small jumps are very annoying :
> it can show, in a trace, that a fork() appears on a CPU after the first
> schedule() of the thread on the other CPU : scheduling causality relationship
> can become very hard to follow. This is only a sample case. Inaccuracy and
> periodical modification of the clock time (non monotonic) can cause important
> inaccuracy in performance tests, even on UP systems. A monotonic clock,
> accessible from anywhere in kernel space (including NMI handler) and
> from user space is very useful for performance analysis and, more
> generally, for timestamping data in per cpu buffers so it can be later
> reordered correctly.

What about adding a layer below do_gettimeofday() which just scheds the
adjustment process? That might be reasonable .. The NMI, and userspace
cases aren't very compelling right now, at least I'm not convinced a
whole new timing interface is needed ..

The latency tracing system in the -rt branch modifies the gettimeofday
facilities , I'm not sure of the correctness of it but it gets called
from anyplace in the kernel including NMI's . 

Here's the function,

cycle_t notrace get_monotonic_cycles(void)
{
        cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;

        /* read clocksource: */
        cycle_now = clocksource_read(clock);

        /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
        cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;

        return clock->cycle_last + cycle_delta;
}

That looks safe. When converting this to nanoseconds you would still get
the time adjustments but it would be all at once instead of in little
increments ..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/