[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070226065943.GA3037@holomorphy.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:59:43 -0800
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Make sure we populate the initroot filesystem late enough
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:01:06PM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yeah, I did that before giving up on it for the day and going in search
> of dinner. It changes the failure mode to a BUG() in
> cache_free_debugcheck(), at line 2876 of mm/slab.c
> It smells like the pages weren't actually reserved in the first place
> and we were blithely allocating them. The only problem with that theory
> is that the initrd doesn't seem to be getting corrupted -- and if we
> were handing out its pages like that then surely _something_ would have
> scribbled on it before we tried to read it.
> When I head back in tomorrow morning I'll instrument free_initrd_mem()
> to check that the PageReserved bit was actually set on each page, before
> clearing it. And I'll make the page allocation routines check whether
> they're giving out pages between initrd_start and initrd_end, etc.
Another few things to try would be inserting checks in page_alloc.c for
pages in that specific range before some flag set in free_initrd_mem()
is set, and (conflicting with that, though easily reconciled) unmapping
initrd memory in free_initrd_mem() instead of freeing it.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists