[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E47DEF.70405@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:52:31 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Add pagetable accessors to pack
and unpack pagetable entries
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>> #include <asm/page.h>
>> #include <asm/cache.h>
>> #include <asm/boot.h>
>> +
>> +#undef ENTRY
>> +#undef ALIGN
>>
>
> hm, what's this? The reason is not documented.
>
Good point; I'll add some comments. The reason is that asm/linkage.h
ends up being included as a result of the other header file changes, and
it conflicts with the use of ENTRY and ALIGN here. But its possible
that asm/linkage isn't needed anymore; that would be ideal if true.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>> +/* After pte_t, etc, have been defined */
>> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>> +#endif
>>
>
> hm - there's already a CONFIG_PARAVIRT conditional in
> asm-i386/paravirt.h.
>
Yes, but it happens after asm/paravirt.h has already included some
things, and it ends up causing problems. paravirt.h still defines
various stub functions in the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT case, so it needs to do
the includes either way.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists