[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070227122727.3bc61fbf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:27:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: akuster <akuster@...sta.com>
Cc: ioe-lkml@...eria.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] MM: detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped fix
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:27:00 -0800 akuster <akuster@...sta.com> wrote:
> Wolfgang Wander submitted a fix to address a mmap fragmentation issue.
> The git patch ( 1363c3cd8603a913a27e2995dccbd70d5312d8e6 ) is somewhat
> different and yields different results when running Wolfgang's test case
> leakme.c.
>
> IMHO, the vm start and end address are swapped in arch_unmap_area and
> arch_unmap_area_topdown functions.
>
> Prior to this patch arch_unmap_area() used area->vm_start and
> arch_unmap_area_topdown used area->vm_end in the git patch the following
> change showed up.
>
> if (mm->unmap_area == arch_unmap_area)
> addr = prev ? prev->vm_start : mm->mmap_base;
> else
> addr = vma ? vma->vm_end : mm->mmap_base;
>
> Using Wolfgang Wander's leakme.c test, I get the same results seen with
> his original "Avoiding mmap fragmentation" patch as I do after swapping
> the start & end address in the above code segment. The patch I
> submitted addresses this typo issue.
That's still not an adequate or terribly useful changlog, sorry.
Please tell us exactly what this patch does, without referring to some other
patch which I cannot remember nor presently access.
I particular, before-and-after testing results would be useful so we can
see what the effect of this change is.
Also, please send a Signed-of-by: for this work, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists