linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 2/2] cciss: supercedes add shutdown support (replaces reboot notifier)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070227122634.324fc8b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:26:34 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@...rdog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
Cc:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2] cciss: supercedes add shutdown support (replaces
 reboot notifier)

> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:42:39 -0600 "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@...rdog.cca.cpqcorp.net> wrote:
> This patch supercedes yesterdays cciss-shutdown patch. The primary difference is
> removing __devexit from cciss_remove_one. Instead of create another function I'd
> rather use the code that was intended to perform the cleanup and cache flush. I've
> tested as a loadable module and statically linked without error.
> Please consider this for inclusion.

Please don't document patches like this.

The entirety of your changelog and the Subject: are relative to a patch
which will never hit the mainline git tree.  Put yourself in the position
of someone reading the git changelogs in a year's time.  They're going to
be left scratching their heads at the above, aren't they?

Always include a complete and standalone, not-referential-to-an-old-patch
changelog in each iteration of a patch.

Always choose a suitable Subject:

Yes, it's good to tell us things about how this patch differs from the
previous one.  That info can be placed after the ^--- which comes after
your signed-off-by:, or can be placed at the top of the email, as long as
the full permanent changelog is there too.

Bottom line: you are submitting code and its documentation into the
permanent kernel record, not just the mailing list.  Try to make it
appropriate, thanks.

Please send a new Subject: and changlog for this patch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/