linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/6] fault vs truncate/invalidate race fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1172559262.11949.47.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:54:22 +0100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, npiggin@...e.de,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] fault vs truncate/invalidate race fix


> the new fault hander made the memory manager code a lot cleaner and
> very less hacky in a lot of cases. so I'd rather merge the clean code
> than have to fight with the current code...

Note that you can probably get away with NOPFN_REFAULT etc... like I did
for the SPEs in the meantime.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/