[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E4D1B1.7030903@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:49:53 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 06/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: paravirt_ops: allocate a fixmap
slot
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> why not vmalloc it on the guest side? fixmaps are bad for this purpose
>> for a general paravirt implementation, it limits the size of the shared
>> info page, etc.
>>
>
> Yes. vmalloc would have the annoying side-effect of actually allocating
> some pages which would be shadowed by the remapping, but I guess
> get_vm_area would do the job. I'll give it a go.
Hm, this is a bit awkward. We need to map the shared info page fairly
early - say, around paging_init - but we're still on the bootmem
allocator at that point, so get_vm_area isn't usable yet. Using a
fixmap keeps things simple. It seems to me that having a single fixmap
available is useful for this kind of simple/early mapping, and if
someone needs to map something larger, then they can put it off until
get_vm_area() is available...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists