linux-kernel - RE: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93C4769E3BED6B42B7203BD6F065654C08C5D7FF@dmoexc01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:14:41 +0100
From:	"Mathiasen, Torben" <Torben.Mathiasen@...com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"Timur Tabi" <timur@...escale.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices

> Mathiasen, Torben wrote:
> >
> > Got around looking at this one. I'm fine with this approach, but the
> > CPM5 fix looks wrong. Shouldn't it be:
> >
> > 49 = /dev/ttyCPM3		PPC CPM (SCC or SMC) - port 3
> >
> > instead?
> >
> 
> Well, how many CPM devices can exist?  If there are really 6 ports
> possible, they need minors up to 51.
> 
> Also, if QE really is just CPM v3, and they share the same minors, why
> change the name?
> 

Assuming QE has 4 entries, I would expect CPM to be the same. But we
need verification of that. If it needs 6, we are in more trouble.

Torben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/