linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev, mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:50:05 +0000 (GMT)
From:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:	Linux Frame Buffer Device Development 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev, mm: hecuba/E-Ink
 fbdev driver


> I'm not sure I understand. What the current implementation does is to
> use host based framebuffer memory. Apps mmap that memory and draw to
> that. Then after the delay, that framebuffer is written to the
> device's memory. That's the scenario for hecubafb where the Apollo
> controller maintains it's own internal framebuffer.
> 
> When you say without the framebuffer, if you meant without the host
> memory, then this method doesn't work. If you mean without the
> device's internal memory, then yes, I think we can do that, because it
> would be up to the driver to use the touched pagelist to then perform
> IO as suitable for its device.

I meant for it to work for non framebuffer devices. I realized that not 
such a great idea.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/