[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E5B604.904@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:04:04 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Dan Malek <dan@...eddedalley.com>
CC: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Torben.Mathiasen@...com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices
Dan Malek wrote:
> I don't know the origin of this thread, but none of
> that looks correct. Today, there can be up to 8
> CPM UART devices, 6 on CPM/CPM2 and 8
> on the QE. If ttyCPM0 starts at minor 46, they
> should be at least monotonically incrementing
> up to ttyCPM7 with minor 53.
Minor nit: On the QE, they'll be called ttyQE0 through ttyQE7.
I agree that the CPM and the QE should share the same starting minor number, so that
ttyCPM0 has the same major/minor number as ttyQE0, since it's not possible to have a CPM
and a QE on the same device. However, ttyCPM0 is currently assigned to 46, and device 50
is an Altix serial card. The only way to give the CPM 6 or 8 slots without moving it is
to overlap the Altix card.
Now I don't know anything about the Altix card, so I don't know if it's possible to use
that card on a system with a CPM or a QE. If it isn't, then I don't know if overlapping
minor numbers is still a problem.
(Note that the Altix card has a range of 50-81, which is pretty big.)
If we move CPM/QE to 192, then I can change the CPM device driver to reflect that, but I
don't know what that means for older kernels.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists