[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702280903010.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:09:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] HID and USB HID update for 2.6.21-rc2
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> The diffstat looks larger because the usbhid code is moved from
> USB-specific directory to HID-specific directory
No. The diffstat looks huge because you moved "hid_blacklist" into a
header file, and that is a big enough change that git won't consider the
rename to be just a rename any more (you basically moved the old
usbdrivers/usb/input/hid-core.c file into *two* files: hid-core.c and
usbhid.h).
Why do that? It now gets included INTO EVERY DAMN FILE that includes
<usbhid.h>, since that one now has that
static const struct hid_blacklist
definition in it. Yet *nothing* wants it, except for the one C file that
it used to be in.
No way in hell will I include this kind of crap without major explanations
for why the "crap" is not crap. And quite frankly, I don't think such
explanations exist.
I'm also not going to pull it if you just add a new commit to undo the
idiocy. That thing needs to be totally re-done, as far as I'm concerned. I
don't want to touch anything that has EVER even *seen* anything that
stupid.
Yes, I'm grumpy. I don't like big changes at this stage, and if they are
also STUPID big changes, as this seems to be, I refuse to pull them
entirely.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists