linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] HID and USB HID update for 2.6.21-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702281038120.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:39:18 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] HID and USB HID update for 2.6.21-rc2



On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> 
> I still think that creating a separate header file solely for purpose of 
> having the large hid blacklist and all related defines separate from the 
> actual implementation is needed. The pages and pages of blacklist just 
> pollute the hid-core.c needlessly. 

BUT IT IS NOT A HEADER FILE!

Dammit!

If it has real code or data in it, it's a .c file, and you don't #include 
it, you *compile* it and you *link* it.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/