[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E919B903-0890-4725-81CF-005003A1A2F6@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:18:21 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Malek <dan@...eddedalley.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Torben.Mathiasen@...com,
linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices
On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Dan Malek wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> I would much rather see these devices moved to a different minor
>> range.
>
> No. We just did that all too recently, and
> i don't know why the minors didn't get
> allocated properly. I don't want to have to
> update all of our embedded software distributions
> just because someone doesn't like minor
> numbers that aren't causing trouble.
> If we allocate unique spaces for all of the
> possible UART variations, there isn't going
> to be enough space.
>
> Just allocate the four slots and we'll deal with
> anything above this in custom products. Using
> more than four of these processor resources
> as UARTs isn't likely to happen because there
> won't be anything left for the interesting
> communication ports.
Why don't we allocate the 2nd group of four as well, just at a new
location. They'll be discontinuous, but at least we'll have support
for all 8.
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists