lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E5D621.1050005@freescale.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:21:05 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Dan Malek <dan@...eddedalley.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Torben.Mathiasen@...com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices

Dan Malek wrote:

> Just allocate the four slots and we'll deal with
> anything above this in custom products. 

Assuming that this is the agreed-upon standard, should I arbitrarily restrict my driver to 
4 ports, or allow all 8?

I assume that if a driver already claims a particular major/minor combo, then when the 2nd 
driver calls uart_add_one_port(), that call will fail?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ