[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070228203515.GA145@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:35:15 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: vatsa@...ibm.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
On 02/28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Okay, but I've just finished the patch that removes the freezability of
> workqueues (appended), so can we please do this in a separate one?
Please, please, no. This patch is of course correct, but it breaks _a lot_
of patches in -mm tree.
May I ask you to send just
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc2.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1829,11 +1829,11 @@ xfs_buf_init(void)
> if (!xfs_buf_zone)
> goto out_free_trace_buf;
>
> - xfslogd_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfslogd");
> + xfslogd_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfslogd");
> if (!xfslogd_workqueue)
> goto out_free_buf_zone;
>
> - xfsdatad_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfsdatad");
> + xfsdatad_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfsdatad");
> if (!xfsdatad_workqueue)
> goto out_destroy_xfslogd_workqueue;
>
>
this bit?
After that, we can do the "removes the freezability of workqueues" patch
against -mm tree.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists