[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070228211651.GC4760@ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:16:51 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, vatsa@...ibm.com,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
Hi!
> > OK, thanks.
> >
> > We can (I think) do pretty much the same with some additional complications
> > in worker_thread() (check !cpu_online() after try_to_freeze() and break).
>
> Okay, but I've just finished the patch that removes the freezability of
> workqueues (appended), so can we please do this in a separate one?
Hmm, nothing obviously wrong with the patch (ACK), but xfs people
should ack this one, too: 'is it okay to let xfs run while suspending'
is not a trivial question.
> Since freezable workqueues are broken in 2.6.21-rc
> (cf. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116855740612755,
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117261312523921&w=2)
> it's better to remove them altogether for 2.6.21 and change the only user of
> them (XFS) accordingly.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists