linux-kernel - Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070228134010.345763e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:40:10 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	John Reiser <jreiser@...Wagon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:11:11 +0900
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:31:20PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > This patch changes arch_setup_additonal_pages() to honor vdso_enabled.
> > For i386 it also allows the option of a fixed addresss to avoid
> > fragmenting the address space.  Compiles and runs on i386.
> > x86_64 [IA32 support] and sh maintainers also please comment.
> > 
> We didn't actually have the sysctl entry wired up on SH, but once that's
> done, this patch works fine there too.
> 
> Andrew, do you want a separate patch for the vdso_enabled sysctl or
> is it more convenient through my git tree?
> 

If it's an sh-only thing then through your tree is fine, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/