[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93C4769E3BED6B42B7203BD6F065654C08C5DEC5@dmoexc01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:38:54 +0100
From: "Mathiasen, Torben" <Torben.Mathiasen@...com>
To: "Dan Malek" <dan@...eddedalley.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: "Kumar Gala" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-ppc-embedded" <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>,
"Segher Boessenkool" <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices
> We are making a very complicated problem
> out of nothing. This hasn't caused any problems
> in the past, and changing the existing names and
> minors will cause problems for everyone today.
>
> Just leave it alone, fix up the documentation,
> and have the driver print some warning if it
> allocates more than 4 UARTs.
>
Dan has a point here. Now I clearly can't comment on how bad 8 is
needed, but since this has been like this for a while, I'll have to
assume 4 is covering most cases.
Moving things to a different range _will_ be much worse for distro
maintainers than driver developers. And I bet the latter is going to be
minor work as things has been like this for a while.
But we can still allocate 4 more at a different minor that distro's can
_choose_ to use. Consider it an enhancement to the 4 we have had in the
past.
Torben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists