[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070301141637.GA20006@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:16:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
* Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> I can tell you that the problem (at least on my machine) comes from :
>
> gettimeofday(&tm, NULL);
>
> in evserver_epoll.c
yeah, that's another difference - especially if it's something like an
Athlon64 and gettimeofday falls back to pm-timer, that could explain the
performance difference. That's why i repeatedly asked Evgeniy to use the
/very same/ client function for both the epoll and the kevent test and
redo the measurements. The numbers are still highly suspect - and we are
already down from the prior claim of kevent being almost twice as fast
to a 25% difference.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists