lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:22:25 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in on_each_cpu?

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:47:39 -0800 Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com> wrote:

> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 03:34 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >   
> >> What would be really, really nice would be to statically check all 
> >> callsites that issue irq disables actually keep irqs disabled.  
> >> Presumably, there was a reason they disabled irqs, and re-enabling them 
> >> underneath their noses, even if it is to avoid a race, breaks the logic 
> >> behind that reason.
> >>     
> >
> > For the moment, how about a BUG_ON() in on_each_cpu()?
> >   
> 
> Sounds quite decent.  But why does on_each_cpu need to disable 
> interrupts at all?  It just calls func(), then re-enables interrupts.  
> So whatever was going to happen during func() that might not be 
> interrupt safe could just be done in the callee, avoiding the rather 
> expensive mess of disabling and re-enabling interrupts for those cases 
> where it doesn't matter.

The handler for smp_call_function() is called with local interrupts
disabled (from the IPI handler).

So to provide a consistent call environment for that handler, on_each_cpu()
will also disable local interrupts when making the direct call on this CPU.

Similarly the !CONFIG_SMP version of on_each_cpu() disables local
interrupts when running the caller's function.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ