[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D077F753-DA34-47AD-8F8F-76643A0DD692@embeddedalley.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:12 -0500
From: Dan Malek <dan@...eddedalley.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: Torben.Mathiasen@...com,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices
Since I'm probably the only one that
really uses the driver for custom
uses and cares......
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Ok guys, I need a consensus here. Are we going to allocate a
> second block of 4 minor numbers for the QE/CPM UART or not?
not.
> My driver already has a macro that limits the number of UARTS to 4,
perfect.
> I'll add a second TTY struct...
Don't worry about it for now. We'll just keep this in
mind when we make a major change someday in
the future. We may have a better solution then.
Thanks.
-- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists