[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703011123200.23932@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:31:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Ingo, do you really think I will send mails with faked benchmarks? :))
I don't think he ever implied that. He was only suggesting that when you
post benchmarks, and even more when you make claims based on benchmarks,
you need to be extra carefull about what you measure. Otherwise the
external view that you give to others does not look good.
Kevent can be really faster than epoll, but if you post broken benchmarks
(that can be, unrealiable HTTP loaders, broken server implemenations,
etc..) and make claims based on that, the only effect that you have is to
lose your point.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists