[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070301231003.GD10643@holomorphy.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:10:03 -0800
From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH (updated)] timer: Run calc_load halfway through each round_jiffies second
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:52:01PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> Whenever jiffies is started at a multiple of 5*HZ or wraps, calc_load is
> run exactly on the second which is when tasks using round_jiffies will
> be scheduled to run. This has a bad effect on the load average, making
> it tend towards 1.00 if a task happens to run every time the load is
> being calculated.
> This changes calc_load so that it updates load half a second after any
> tasks scheduled using round_jiffies.
> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Well, it doesn't reintroduce the for_each_task() (not that it's present
in similar form) loop in count_active_tasks(), so it doesn't bother me.
You seem to have merely changed some offsets, which resolves the
round_jiffies() clash. It's easy to envision similar degenerate cases,
though I'm not sure we care enough to drop in a PRNG to handle them.
== wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists