linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45E7658A.9060309@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:45:14 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>, balducci@...ts.it,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran
 value

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Problem description at:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8048
> 
> Commit b18ec80396834497933d77b81ec0918519f4e2a7 
>     [PATCH] sched: improve migration accuracy
> optimized the scheduler time calculations, but broke posix-cpu-timers.
> 
> The problem is that the p->last_ran value is not updated after a context
> switch. So a subsequent call to current_sched_time() calculates with a
> stale p->last_ran value, i.e. accounts the full time, which the task was
> scheduled away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@ switch_tasks:
>  
>  	sched_info_switch(prev, next);
>  	if (likely(prev != next)) {
> -		next->timestamp = now;
> +		next->timestamp = next->last_ran = now;
>  		rq->nr_switches++;
>  		rq->curr = next;
>  		++*switch_count;
> 

Is this going to be merged or not??

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/