[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070301091408.GA4324@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:14:08 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@...log.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
vapier@...too.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/5] Blackfin: on-chip RTC controller driver
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:15:46PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> +#define stamp(fmt, args...) pr_debug("%s:%i: " fmt "\n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ## args)
> +#define stampit() stamp("here i am")
> +
Are these really necessary for the final driver? It's littered all over
the place, and presumably the driver should be functional enough to not
need this sort of debugging instrumentation.
[snip]
> +static void rtc_bfin_sync_pending(void)
> +{
> + stampit();
> + while (!(bfin_read_RTC_ISTAT() & RTC_ISTAT_WRITE_COMPLETE)) {
> + if (!(bfin_read_RTC_ISTAT() & RTC_ISTAT_WRITE_PENDING))
> + break;
> + }
> + bfin_write_RTC_ISTAT(RTC_ISTAT_WRITE_COMPLETE);
> +}
> +
No timeout? (and superfluous braces)
> + case RTC_PIE_ON:
> + stampit();
> + spin_lock_irq(&rtc->lock);
> + rtc_bfin_sync_pending();
And it's also called under a spinlock each time.. this is a disaster
waiting to happen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists