linux-kernel - Re: PATCH 2.6.21-rc1 aoe: handle zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070302043039.GA18651@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 04:30:39 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, support@...aid.com,
	"Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH 2.6.21-rc1 aoe: handle zero _count pages in bios

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:22:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I spose slab _could_ take a ref on these pages.

What it would need to do is:

 - add a reference for every object touching this page
 - don't give the page back to the page allocator or reuse any
   single object inside it until there are no more reference to the page.

I don't think this is a very good idea, although the netowkring references
tend to be rather short-term once making this not a that bad burden.

> Networking internally maintains caller memory lifetimes, and it assumes
> that the caller allocated memory via __alloc_pages() - because it uses
> get_page() and put_page().
> 
> BIO, however, does not internally manage caller memory lifetime.  This is
> because the caller's ->bi_end_io is always called, so the caller can do it.
> 
> So where we've come unstuck is in a module which has gone and fed BIO
> memory into networking.  The differing design philosophies are clashing.
> 
> I'm surprised this doesn't happen in other places - aren't there any other
> drivers which take a BIO and stuff it down the network?
> 
> Anyway, where's the bug?
> 
> Really, I'd say it's XFS (and ext3).  Even though BIO doesn't presently
> manage page lifetimes, it _could_.  After all, the function is called
> bio_add_page(), not bio_add_virtual_address().  It's a bit hacky to kmalloc
> some memory, run virt_to_page() and to then present that page to BIO even
> though the caller (thanks to the slab optimisation) doesn't actually have
> control of that page's lifetime.

That was the conclusion I came to when this was brought up initially.
Fixing up XFS would be easyish and only waste a tiny amount of memory,
and the same is true for ext3 (I did in fact suggest just using get_free_page
for this case but got shot down for stupid reasons when the slab debug
alignment issues in that area came up)

But in this case we'd really need to enforce this, and add a
BUG_ON(PageSlab(page)) in bio_add_page to trip everyone submit
this kind of pages.

> So we have a few options to look at:
> 
> a) kludge things in AOE.  Unpleasing, and might cause memory leaks
>    (although it won't, because the caller hasn't run bi_end_io yet).
> 
> b) Take a ref on slab pages in slab.  A bit costly, perhaps.
> 
> c) teach ext3 and XFS to take a ref on these pages as they are added to
>    the BIOs, undo that ref in bi_end_io.
> 
> I think c)?

Yes.  I'm perfectly fine with this as long as we document and enforce
this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/