[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070301234645.09da8484.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:46:45 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...e.de>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fixes and cleanups for earlyprintk aka boot console.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:35:49 +0100 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...e.de> wrote:
> The console subsystem already has an idea of a boot console, using the
> CON_BOOT flag. The implementation has some flaws though. The major
> problem is that presence of a boot console makes register_console()
> ignore any other console devices (unless explicitly specified on the
> kernel command line).
>
> This patch fixes the console selection code to *not* consider a boot
> console a full-featured one, so the first non-boot console registering
> will become the default console instead. This way the unregister call
> for the boot console in the register_console() function actually
> triggers and the handover from the boot console to the real console
> device works smoothly. Added a printk for the handover, so you know
> which console device the output goes to when the boot console stops
> printing messages.
>
> The disable_early_printk() call is obsolete with that patch, explicitly
> disabling the early console isn't needed any more as it works
> automagically with that patch.
>
> I've walked through the tree, dropped all disable_early_printk()
> instances found below arch/ and tagged the consoles with CON_BOOT if
> needed.
>
> The code is tested on x86 only so far. It is probably a good idea to
> run it in -mm for a while to shake out any architecture issues which
> might show up. Comments?
It blows up on powerpc:
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x2080): In function `.console_init':
: undefined reference to `.disable_early_printk'
and the below patch might help.
But my confidence level isn't high so I'll drop it for now. I have a feeling
this will need careful testing.
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/early_printk.c~fixes-and-cleanups-for-earlyprintk-aka-boot-console-fix
+++ a/arch/x86_64/kernel/early_printk.c
@@ -249,17 +249,3 @@ static int __init setup_early_printk(cha
}
early_param("earlyprintk", setup_early_printk);
-
-void __init disable_early_printk(void)
-{
- if (!early_console_initialized || !early_console)
- return;
- if (!keep_early) {
- printk("disabling early console\n");
- unregister_console(early_console);
- early_console_initialized = 0;
- } else {
- printk("keeping early console\n");
- }
-}
-
diff -puN drivers/char/tty_io.c~fixes-and-cleanups-for-earlyprintk-aka-boot-console-fix drivers/char/tty_io.c
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c~fixes-and-cleanups-for-earlyprintk-aka-boot-console-fix
+++ a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -141,8 +141,6 @@ static DECLARE_MUTEX(allocated_ptys_lock
static int ptmx_open(struct inode *, struct file *);
#endif
-extern void disable_early_printk(void);
-
static void initialize_tty_struct(struct tty_struct *tty);
static ssize_t tty_read(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
@@ -3889,13 +3887,6 @@ void __init console_init(void)
/* Setup the default TTY line discipline. */
(void) tty_register_ldisc(N_TTY, &tty_ldisc_N_TTY);
- /*
- * set up the console device so that later boot sequences can
- * inform about problems etc..
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
- disable_early_printk();
-#endif
call = __con_initcall_start;
while (call < __con_initcall_end) {
(*call)();
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists