linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id to asm/smp.h - alpha, m32r, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, um

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1172824281.6646.3.camel@sebastian.intellilink.co.jp>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:31:21 +0900
From:	Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 
	<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	fastboot@...ts.osdl.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, ak@...e.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, judith@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id to
	asm/smp.h - alpha, m32r, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, um

On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:03 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:18:23PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id to asm/smp.h on alpha, m32r,
> > powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, and um architectures.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
> > ---
> > 
> > diff -urNp linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/asm-alpha/smp.h linux-2.6.21-rc2-hwcpuid/include/asm-alpha/smp.h
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/asm-alpha/smp.h	2007-02-05 03:44:54.000000000 +0900
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-hwcpuid/include/asm-alpha/smp.h	2007-03-07 13:34:14.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ int smp_call_function_on_cpu(void (*func
> > 
> >  #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> > 
> > +#define hard_smp_processor_id()		0
> >  #define smp_call_function_on_cpu(func,info,retry,wait,cpu)    ({ 0; })
> > 
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> /me thinks you should merge this patch with patch 1. Otherwise there is no
> hard_smp_processor_id() defined on any architecture if only patch 1 is
> applied. That would break a git bisect search.
Hi Heiko,

Thank you for reviewing the patch-set. The patches have already been
merged in Andrew's tree but I will take your advice into account when
submitting new patches. I certainly would not like to break bisect
searches.

Fernando

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/