[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070302105618.GA18377@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:56:18 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
* Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:
> Even if kevent has the same speed, it still allows to handle _any_
> kind of events without any major surgery - a very tiny structure of
> lock and list head and you can process your own kernel event in
> userspace with timers, signals, io events, private userspace events
> and others without races and invention of differnet hacks for
> different types - _this_ is main point.
did it ever occur to you to ... extend epoll? To speed it up? To add a
new wait syscall to it? Instead of introducing a whole new parallel
framework?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists