[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070302000808.GE10643@holomorphy.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:08:08 -0800
From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
To: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with shm namespace cleanups
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:13:29PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hey. While testing 2.6.21-rc2 with libhugetlbfs, the shm-fork test case
> causes the kernel to oops. To reproduce: Execute 'make check' in the
> latest libhugetlbfs source on a 2.6.21-rc2 kernel with 100 huge pages
> allocated. Using fewer huge pages will likely also trigger the oops.
> Libhugetlbfs can be downloaded from:
> http://libhugetlbfs.ozlabs.org/snapshots/libhugetlbfs-dev-20070228.tar.gz
Looks like I should grab these testcases for the sake of due diligence
(not to say I intend to alter maintenance style from primarily review,
approval, and bugfixing, not that I've been doing as much of any of those
as I should). To which architectures and/or distributions have the
userspace bits been ported, or otherwise run/tested on? A quick sniff
test on an Altix suggests SLES and/or ia64 may trip up the scripts:
$ su -c "make check"
Password:
VERSION
./run_tests.sh: line 1: get_hugetlbfs_path: command not found
run_tests.sh: unable to find hugetlbfs mountpoint
make: *** [check] Error 1
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists