| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:26:41 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1) On Thu 2007-03-01 11:45:35, Jeff Chua wrote: > On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il> wrote: > > > with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend to RAM. > > > > On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network), > > pressing Fn/F4 again does not seem to have any effect. > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the > changes to ACPI and test it? As I said elsewhere in the thread, suspend/resume to RAM works ok on my thinkpad x60. I posted my .config there, perhaps difference is in it? Ingo identified KVM as possible culprit. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists