[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070302135810.GF2156@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:58:10 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?
On Fri 2007-03-02 11:47:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:40:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Whitelist seems like a way to go :(.
>
> The DSDT code clearly can't touch the hardware itself - hardware access
> is carried out by the kernel. If we can identify cases where ACPI reads
> and writes would touch resources claimed by other drivers, that would be
> a good starting point for working out what's going on.
>
> Of course, this ignores the case where the DSDT just traps into SMM
> code. That one is clearly unsolvable.
We can't solve SMM stuff. (Whitelist needed :-).
Actually for the acpi stuff... we might wrap ACPI interpretter with a
semaphore that needs to be taken before starting any AML code. Then
just make sure sensors take same semaphore?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists